Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ZVNBX
GFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$43.09
Change+$0.20 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.95M
GFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ZVNBX (136M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GFAFX (0.29) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFAFX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. GFAFX (11.53). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. ZVNBX (13.99).
| GFAFX | ZVNBX | GFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.52 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 13.904 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 136M | 247,059% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 23.68 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 124.90 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 13.99 | 286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 341.95 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement