Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSZX
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.44
Change-$0.95 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.72M
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WPSZX (718M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WPSZX (0.15). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). WPSZX (0.72) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFAFX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. WPSZX (-6.85). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. WPSZX (13.53).
| GFAFX | WPSZX | GFAFX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.72 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.72 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 8.201 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 718M | 47,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.15 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | -6.85 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 23.29 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 13.53 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 108.04 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement