Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSZX
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$52.53
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets677.6M
GFAFX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSZX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WPSZX (678M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WPSZX (0.15). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). WPSZX (0.74) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFAFX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. WPSZX (-3.26). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. WPSZX (5.58).
| GFAFX | WPSZX | GFAFX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.73 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.74 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | -0.962 | -955% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 678M | 50,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.15 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | -3.26 | -178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.35 | 18.77 | 348% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 5.58 | 404% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | 91.39 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement