Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$52.40
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets678.14M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPSGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WPSGX (678M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. WPSGX (-2.98). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. WPSGX (5.51).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | -0.870 | -1,055% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 678M | 50,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.13 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -2.98 | -200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.57 | 18.78 | 355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 5.51 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.69 | 89.48 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement