Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.09
Change+$1.11 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$57.15
Change+$0.61 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.28M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WPSGX (717M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. WPSGX (-6.54). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. WPSGX (17.40).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 6.962 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 717M | 47,001% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.13 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -6.54 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 33.15 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 17.40 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 100.21 | 100% |