Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$56.25
Change-$0.95 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.72M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WPSGX (718M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. WPSGX (-6.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. WPSGX (13.34).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 8.210 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 718M | 47,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.13 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | -6.88 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 23.18 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 13.34 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | 107.36 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement