Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPSGX
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$55.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets686.22M
GFAFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WPSGX (686M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. WPSGX (-9.13). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.05 vs. WPSGX (8.86).
| GFAFX | WPSGX | GFAFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.106 | 5.902 | 341% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 686M | 49,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.13 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | -9.13 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.34 | 18.10 | 350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.05 | 8.86 | 362% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.60 | 96.22 | 99% |