Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$42.65
Change-$7.14 (-14.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets636.79M
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WPCSX (637M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFAFX (0.22) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. WPCSX (-9.54). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. WPCSX (-11.92).
| GFAFX | WPCSX | GFAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | -2.936 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 637M | 52,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | -9.54 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | -0.65 | -6,842% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | -11.92 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | 82.03 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers