Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPCSX
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.59
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets687.43M
GFAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WPCSX (687M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFAFX (0.28) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. WPCSX (-11.43). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.86 vs. WPCSX (1.35).
| GFAFX | WPCSX | GFAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.872 | 4.896 | 385% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 687M | 49,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | -11.43 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.66 | 12.59 | 490% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.86 | 1.35 | 2,368% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.59 | 70.84 | 132% |