Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs UGLSX
GFAFX vs UGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs UGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6
Price$58.79
Change-$18.31 (-23.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
GFAFX vs UGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. UGLSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and UGLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. UGLSX (1.35B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than UGLSX: GFAFX (0.22) vs UGLSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than UGLSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs UGLSX (14 years). UGLSX (0.78) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. UGLSX (29.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGLSX: GFAFX (250) vs UGLSX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. UGLSX (-23.56). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. UGLSX (-17.96).
| GFAFX | UGLSX | GFAFX / UGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.77 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.78 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | -5.330 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.35B | 24,834% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | -23.56 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | -2.79 | -1,597% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | -17.96 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | 54.02 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement