Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TRIRX
GFAFX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TRIRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
Price$75.73
Change-$0.17 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.36B
GFAFX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TRIRX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TRIRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. TRIRX (17.4B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: TRIRX (0.32) vs GFAFX (0.29). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TRIRX (23 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.30). TRIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: TRIRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.06 vs. GFAFX (18.40). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 68.61 vs. GFAFX (42.23).
| GFAFX | TRIRX | GFAFX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.30 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.30 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 12.027 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 17.4B | 1,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | 24.06 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | 73.63 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | 68.61 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | 267.12 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers