Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TRIHX
GFAFX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TRIHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx I
Price$74.96
Change-$0.22 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.51B
GFAFX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TRIHX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TRIHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. TRIHX (17.5B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: TRIHX (0.44) vs GFAFX (0.30). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: GFAFX (24 years) vs TRIHX (10 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.16). TRIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: GFAFX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.10 vs. GFAFX (14.63). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 74.67 vs. GFAFX (44.21).
| GFAFX | TRIHX | GFAFX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.16 | 419% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.16 | 419% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.262 | 12.148 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 17.5B | 1,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.44 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.63 | 21.10 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.59 | 55.31 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.21 | 74.67 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement