Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBDCX
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.59
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.47M
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and TBDCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. TBDCX (438M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs TBDCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. TBDCX (-3.76). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.05 vs. TBDCX (-9.26).
| GFAFX | TBDCX | GFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.81 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.87 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.106 | 17.632 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 438M | 77,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | -3.76 | -209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.34 | 67.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.05 | -9.26 | -346% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.60 | 32.53 | 294% |