Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBDCX
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$12.33
Change-$1.39 (-10.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets417.08M
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and TBDCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TBDCX (417M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: GFAFX (0.22) vs TBDCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFAFX (2.63) and TBDCX (2.58) have marching annual gain over last year. GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. TBDCX (-7.29).
| GFAFX | TBDCX | GFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.81 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.87 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | -2.760 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 417M | 80,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | 2.58 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | 43.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | -7.29 | -181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | 50.37 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers