Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBDCX
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.55
Change-$0.31 (-2.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets431.69M
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. TBDCX (432M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs TBDCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. TBDCX (-4.17). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. TBDCX (-6.94).
| GFAFX | TBDCX | GFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.81 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.87 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 15.417 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 432M | 78,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | -4.17 | -159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 68.53 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | -6.94 | -534% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | 33.89 | 281% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers