Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLGCX
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$6.08
Change-$0.15 (-2.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLGCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. SLGCX (41.9M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs SLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. SLGCX (-47.82). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. SLGCX (-62.10).
| GFAFX | SLGCX | GFAFX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 20.971 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 41.9M | 811,456% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | -47.82 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | -35.37 | -179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | -62.10 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | -73.61 | -129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement