Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLGCX
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.87
Change-$0.86 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$1.98
Change-$0.04 (-1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.42M
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLGCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and SLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. SLGCX (40.4M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: GFAFX (0.22) vs SLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. SLGCX (-61.40). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.50 vs. SLGCX (-86.77).
| GFAFX | SLGCX | GFAFX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.67 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.67 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.570 | -1.000 | -157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 40.4M | 831,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | -61.40 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.71 | -74.68 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.50 | -86.77 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | -89.75 | -135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement