Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLCGX
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth I
Price$34.32
Change-$0.85 (-2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLCGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SLCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. SLCGX (41.9M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLCGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs SLCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLCGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SLCGX (31 years). SLCGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLCGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. SLCGX (-1.68). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. SLCGX (25.16).
| GFAFX | SLCGX | GFAFX / SLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 21.906 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 41.9M | 811,456% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | -1.68 | -526% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 56.66 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 25.16 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 22.60 | 452% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement