Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLCGX
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.59
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth I
Price$35.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.27M
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLCGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and SLCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. SLCGX (41.3M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLCGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs SLCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLCGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SLCGX (31 years). SLCGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLCGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. SLCGX (-3.61). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.86 vs. SLCGX (21.72).
| GFAFX | SLCGX | GFAFX / SLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.872 | 21.386 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 41.3M | 820,823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | -3.61 | -193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.66 | 53.19 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.86 | 21.72 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.59 | 17.06 | 549% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement