Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SBHAX
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.74M
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SBHAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and SBHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. SBHAX (85.7M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: GFAFX (0.29) vs SBHAX (0.20). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. SBHAX (-11.51). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. SBHAX (5.24).
| GFAFX | SBHAX | GFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.84 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 5.940 | 302% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 85.7M | 393,232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.20 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -11.51 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 9.75 | 741% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 5.24 | 764% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 74.18 | 136% |