Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SBHAX
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$16.60
Change-$4.31 (-20.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.81M
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SBHAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and SBHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. SBHAX (65.8M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: GFAFX (0.22) vs SBHAX (0.05). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SBHAX (13 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SBHAX (27.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. SBHAX (-17.81). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. SBHAX (-23.16).
| GFAFX | SBHAX | GFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.84 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | 1.405 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 65.8M | 510,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.05 | 406% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | -17.81 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | -13.15 | -339% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | -23.16 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | 60.80 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement