Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RPXFX
GFAFX vs RPXFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RPXFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
RiverPark Large Growth Retail
Price$30.15
Change-$0.55 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.49M
GFAFX vs RPXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RPXFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and RPXFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RPXFX (51.5M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RPXFX: GFAFX (0.28) vs RPXFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RPXFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RPXFX (15 years). RPXFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RPXFX (21.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPXFX: GFAFX (250) vs RPXFX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. RPXFX (2.66). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. RPXFX (0.70).
| GFAFX | RPXFX | GFAFX / RPXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.25 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.29 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 12.082 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 51.5M | 660,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 2.66 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 80.54 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 0.70 | 5,278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | 67.15 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement