Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$65.42
Change-$15.57 (-19.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.24M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RBCGX (71.2M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.22) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RBCGX (38 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. RBCGX (-6.22). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. RBCGX (-13.78).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.01 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.01 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | -1.357 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 71.2M | 471,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | -6.22 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | 41.14 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | -13.78 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | 29.85 | 399% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement