Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$67.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.32M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RBCGX (73.3M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. RBCGX (-3.76). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. RBCGX (-3.90).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.01 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.01 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | -0.252 | -3,641% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 73.3M | 462,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -3.76 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.57 | 59.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | -3.90 | -578% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.69 | 18.54 | 511% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement