Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$79.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.57M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and RBCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RBCGX (76.6M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.75 vs. GFAFX (11.53). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. RBCGX (9.45).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 17.514 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 76.6M | 438,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 15.75 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 75.54 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 9.45 | 424% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 34.83 | 289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement