Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QILGX
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QILGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth IS
Price$42.67
Change+$0.16 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.99B
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QILGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and QILGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. QILGX (3.99B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QILGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs QILGX (0.01). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QILGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs QILGX (20 years). QILGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: GFAFX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.27 vs. GFAFX (11.53). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.45 vs. GFAFX (40.02).
| GFAFX | QILGX | GFAFX / QILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.87 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 15.731 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 3.99B | 8,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.01 | 4,674% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 17.27 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 88.43 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 51.45 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 148.71 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers