Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QCLGX
GFAFX vs QCLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QCLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.09
Change+$1.11 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.79
Change+$0.33 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.04B
GFAFX vs QCLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QCLGX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and QCLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. QCLGX (4.04B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs QCLGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QCLGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs QCLGX (20 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: GFAFX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.39 vs. GFAFX (11.53). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. QCLGX (24.61).
| GFAFX | QCLGX | GFAFX / QCLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.86 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 14.851 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 4.04B | 8,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 14.39 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 70.52 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 24.61 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 84.45 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers