Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$121.06
Change-$2.52 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.96B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PRGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PRGFX (52B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.28) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PRGFX (76 years). GFAFX (0.67) and PRGFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). PRGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. GFAFX (8.83). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. PRGFX (30.84).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 76 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 17.182 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 52B | 654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | 9.82 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 80.20 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 30.84 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 121.21 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement