Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PRGFX
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PRGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.43B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
Price$120.17
Change+$0.49 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.11B
GFAFX vs PRGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PRGFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PRGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PRGFX (51.1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs PRGFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PRGFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PRGFX (76 years). GFAFX (0.67) and PRGFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: GFAFX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). PRGFX (11.63) and GFAFX (11.41) have marching annual gain over last year. GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.75 vs. PRGFX (28.52).
| GFAFX | PRGFX | GFAFX / PRGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 76 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.693 | 13.484 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 51.1B | 661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.41 | 11.63 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.55 | 82.72 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.75 | 28.52 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.26 | 113.69 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers