Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PNOPX
GFAFX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$123.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.68B
GFAFX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PNOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOPX (6.68B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: PNOPX (0.43) vs GFAFX (0.28). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). PNOPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). PNOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOPX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. PNOPX (-1.84). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. PNOPX (11.90).
| GFAFX | PNOPX | GFAFX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.88 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | 0.817 | 1,124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.68B | 5,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.43 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -1.84 | -323% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.57 | 40.66 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 11.90 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.69 | 82.69 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers