Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$90.77
Change+$0.56 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56B
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PNOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. PNOCX (6.56B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs PNOCX (0.02). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. PNOCX (-7.08). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. PNOCX (-0.22).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 6.550 | 274% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 6.56B | 5,141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.02 | 1,256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -7.08 | -163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 28.71 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -0.22 | -18,270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 36.42 | 276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers