Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$80.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PNOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOCX (6.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs PNOCX (0.02). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). PNOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. PNOCX (-7.46). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. PNOCX (-7.63).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.62 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.62 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | -4.942 | -186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.7B | 5,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.02 | 1,290% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -7.46 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.57 | 25.06 | 266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | -7.63 | -296% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.69 | 35.40 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement