Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PNOCX
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$92.50
Change-$1.59 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.65B
GFAFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PNOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PNOCX (6.65B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs PNOCX (0.02). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. PNOCX (-3.95). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. PNOCX (1.49).
| GFAFX | PNOCX | GFAFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 10.447 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 6.65B | 5,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.02 | 1,265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | -3.95 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 23.91 | 264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 1.49 | 2,485% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | 41.67 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement