Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PBLCX
GFAFX vs PBLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PBLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Principal Blue Chip C
Price$33.35
Change-$11.07 (-24.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.31B
GFAFX vs PBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PBLCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PBLCX (9.31B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PBLCX: GFAFX (0.22) vs PBLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PBLCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PBLCX (12 years). PBLCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PBLCX (20.90). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBLCX: GFAFX (250) vs PBLCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. PBLCX (-20.23). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. PBLCX (1.18).
| GFAFX | PBLCX | GFAFX / PBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.67 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.70 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | -4.959 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 9.31B | 3,611% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | -20.23 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | 19.71 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | 1.18 | 1,117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | 140.97 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers