Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$59.00
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets859.37M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NWCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCFX (859M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.28) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCFX (13 years). NWCFX (0.67) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. NWCFX (-8.81). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. NWCFX (9.36).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.54 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | -5.781 | -159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 859M | 39,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -8.81 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.57 | 41.90 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 9.36 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.69 | 42.58 | 222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement