Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$55.76
Change-$16.02 (-22.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets825.35M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NWCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NWCFX (825M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.22) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCFX (13 years). NWCFX (0.67) and GFAFX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. NWCFX (-12.26). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. NWCFX (-0.89).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.54 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | -4.044 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 825M | 40,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | -12.26 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | 25.70 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | -0.89 | -1,487% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | 59.83 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement