Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$70.50
Change-$1.47 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets880.79M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWCFX (881M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.28) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCFX (13 years). NWCFX (0.69) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. NWCFX (-0.25). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. NWCFX (32.47).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.51 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 14.931 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 881M | 38,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | -0.25 | -3,538% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 55.88 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 32.47 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 57.47 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement