Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$70.28
Change+$0.28 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets868.68M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NWCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NWCFX (869M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.29) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCFX (13 years). NWCFX (0.69) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. NWCFX (2.51). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. NWCFX (29.64).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.51 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 12.233 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 869M | 38,665% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 2.51 | 459% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 69.27 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 29.64 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 54.35 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement