Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCFX
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.59
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$71.20
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.28M
GFAFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NWCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCFX (870M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFAFX (0.28) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCFX (13 years). NWCFX (0.69) and GFAFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. NWCFX (-1.56). NWCFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.58 vs. GFAFX (31.86).
| GFAFX | NWCFX | GFAFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.51 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.872 | 13.175 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 870M | 38,966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | -1.56 | -447% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.66 | 51.08 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.86 | 35.58 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.59 | 48.13 | 194% |