Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.06
Change+$0.38 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$45.63
Change+$0.27 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets866.15M
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NWCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWCCX (866M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. NWCCX (-8.49). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.86 vs. NWCCX (11.20).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.83 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.872 | 12.055 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 866M | 39,261% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | -8.49 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.66 | 30.34 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.86 | 11.20 | 284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.59 | 1.75 | 5,349% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement