Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$46.09
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets880.85M
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NWCCX (881M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. NWCCX (-7.28). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. NWCCX (7.09).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.83 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 13.859 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 881M | 38,706% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | -7.28 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 34.45 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 7.09 | 566% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 8.17 | 1,251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement