Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$33.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets859.37M
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCCX (859M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. NWCCX (-20.87). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. NWCCX (-21.30).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.78 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | -18.231 | -50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 859M | 39,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -20.87 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.57 | 8.95 | 744% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | -21.30 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.69 | -13.08 | -724% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement