Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NWCCX
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$45.04
Change+$0.18 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets868.68M
GFAFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. NWCCX (869M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NWCCX (16 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. NWCCX (-4.72). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. NWCCX (4.79).
| GFAFX | NWCCX | GFAFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.83 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 11.265 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 869M | 38,780% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -4.72 | -244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 46.00 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 4.79 | 835% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 6.00 | 1,676% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement