Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NQCFX
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NQCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.87
Change-$0.86 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NQCFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and NQCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NQCFX (9.74M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: GFAFX (0.22) vs NQCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NQCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NQCFX (24 years). NQCFX (1.42) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NQCFX (11.05). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). NQCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.73 vs. GFAFX (9.57). NQCFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.99 vs. GFAFX (20.50).
| GFAFX | NQCFX | GFAFX / NQCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.42 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.42 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.570 | 2.695 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 9.74M | 3,449,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 11.73 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.71 | 45.32 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.50 | 40.99 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | 117.49 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement