Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs NQCFX
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NQCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
GFAFX vs NQCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NQCFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NQCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NQCFX (9.63M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: GFAFX (0.28) vs NQCFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NQCFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs NQCFX (24 years). NQCFX (1.42) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NQCFX (11.05). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: GFAFX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. NQCFX (3.62). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. NQCFX (32.52).
| GFAFX | NQCFX | GFAFX / NQCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.42 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.42 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 13.723 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 9.63M | 3,530,633% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 3.62 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 46.41 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 32.52 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | 99.40 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement