Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$12.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.71M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MSHOX (5.71M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.13) vs GFAFX (0.28). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. MSHOX (1.45). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. MSHOX (-11.05).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | 3.276 | 280% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 5.71M | 5,937,993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.13 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 1.45 | 400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.35 | 17.34 | 377% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | -11.05 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement