Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.87
Change-$0.86 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$13.11
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.95M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHOX (5.95M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MSHOX: GFAFX (0.22) vs MSHOX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. MSHOX (4.96). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.50 vs. MSHOX (-6.94).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.95 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.570 | 6.846 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 5.95M | 5,649,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 4.96 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.71 | 13.93 | 407% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.50 | -6.94 | -296% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement