Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.27
Change-$0.40 (-2.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.7M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MSHOX (5.7M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.10) vs GFAFX (0.28). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). MSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. GFAFX (6.64). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. MSHOX (2.97).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 21.130 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 5.7M | 5,962,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.10 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 9.78 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 27.44 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 2.97 | 1,245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement