Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLINX
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLINX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$8.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.47B
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLINX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MLINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MLINX (13.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLINX: GFAFX (0.28) vs MLINX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLINX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLINX (18 years). MLINX (1.14) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: GFAFX (250) vs MLINX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. MLINX (-10.92). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. MLINX (-28.15).
| GFAFX | MLINX | GFAFX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.13 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.14 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | -7.863 | -117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 13.5B | 2,511% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -10.92 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.57 | 23.99 | 277% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | -28.15 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.69 | -11.96 | -792% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement