Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLINX
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLINX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$10.35
Change-$0.23 (-2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.69B
GFAFX vs MLINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLINX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MLINX (13.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLINX: GFAFX (0.28) vs MLINX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLINX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLINX (18 years). MLINX (1.14) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: GFAFX (250) vs MLINX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. MLINX (-6.37). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. MLINX (-9.26).
| GFAFX | MLINX | GFAFX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.13 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.14 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 17.165 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 13.7B | 2,482% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | -6.37 | -139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 28.87 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | -9.26 | -433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 2.52 | 4,057% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement