Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLGRX
GFAFX vs MLGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class R3
Price$8.88
Change-$0.20 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.69B
GFAFX vs MLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLGRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MLGRX (13.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLGRX: GFAFX (0.28) vs MLGRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLGRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLGRX (20 years). MLGRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). MLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: MLGRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. MLGRX (-9.29). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. MLGRX (-17.08).
| GFAFX | MLGRX | GFAFX / MLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.29 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 17.010 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 13.7B | 2,482% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | -9.29 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 21.07 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | -17.08 | -235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | -10.10 | -1,012% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement