Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLGRX
GFAFX vs MLGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.09
Change+$1.11 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class R3
Price$9.00
Change+$0.10 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.85B
GFAFX vs MLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLGRX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MLGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. MLGRX (13.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLGRX: GFAFX (0.29) vs MLGRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLGRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLGRX (19 years). MLGRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). MLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: MLGRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. MLGRX (-6.22). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. MLGRX (-18.80).
| GFAFX | MLGRX | GFAFX / MLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.29 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 14.691 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 13.8B | 2,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -6.22 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | 30.69 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -18.80 | -213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | -11.62 | -866% |