Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.85B
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MLACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. MLACX (13.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: GFAFX (0.29) vs MLACX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. MLACX (-20.33). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. MLACX (-45.43).
| GFAFX | MLACX | GFAFX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 14.219 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 13.8B | 2,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -20.33 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | -2.78 | -2,600% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -45.43 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | -47.65 | -211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement