Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLACX
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.89
Change-$0.11 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.69B
GFAFX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MLACX (13.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: GFAFX (0.28) vs MLACX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. MLACX (-22.96). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. MLACX (-44.26).
| GFAFX | MLACX | GFAFX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 16.550 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 13.7B | 2,482% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | -22.96 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | -9.91 | -655% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | -44.26 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | -46.75 | -219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement