Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLRX
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$52.28
Change-$1.72 (-3.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LGLRX (8.01B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.42 vs. GFAFX (8.83). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. LGLRX (23.51).
| GFAFX | LGLRX | GFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.672 | 19.179 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 8.01B | 4,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | 19.42 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 113.44 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 23.51 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 135.81 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement