Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.87
Change-$0.86 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$56.33
Change-$0.93 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.8B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLFX (7.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.22) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLFX (15 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.73 vs. GFAFX (9.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.50 vs. LGLFX (18.02).
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.570 | 0.178 | 883% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.8B | 4,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 14.73 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.71 | 112.25 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.50 | 18.02 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | 174.78 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers