Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLCX
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.79
Change-$1.38 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$45.19
Change-$1.17 (-2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.9B
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLCX (7.9B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.86 vs. GFAFX (6.77). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.49 vs. LGLCX (16.98).
| GFAFX | LGLCX | GFAFX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.892 | 15.323 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.9B | 4,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.77 | 10.86 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.79 | 105.95 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.49 | 16.98 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.71 | 114.93 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers