Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$54.82
Change+$0.09 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLAX (7.84B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLAX (15 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. GFAFX (5.79). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. LGLAX (18.48).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | 16.046 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.84B | 4,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 11.26 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.35 | 122.48 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 18.48 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | 142.57 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers