Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.87
Change-$0.86 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$53.86
Change-$0.89 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.8B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLAX (7.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.22) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLAX (15 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. GFAFX (9.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.50 vs. LGLAX (15.70).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.570 | 0.167 | 938% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.8B | 4,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 14.33 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.71 | 110.47 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.50 | 15.70 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.12 | 164.41 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers