Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLAX
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$54.63
Change-$1.80 (-3.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
GFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LGLAX (8.01B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.77 vs. GFAFX (6.64). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. LGLAX (22.16).
| GFAFX | LGLAX | GFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 15.644 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 8.01B | 4,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 15.77 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 109.55 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 22.16 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | 134.36 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement