Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Columbia Cornerstone Growth C
Price$57.17
Change-$1.20 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.67B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LEGCX (6.67B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). LEGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. GFAFX (6.64). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. LEGCX (33.42).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.055 | 17.115 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 6.67B | 5,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 8.62 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.22 | 79.60 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 33.42 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.21 | 86.13 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement