Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.59
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Columbia Cornerstone Growth C
Price$58.04
Change-$0.11 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LEGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LEGCX (6.62B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.86 vs. LEGCX (6.73). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.05 vs. LEGCX (28.18).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.73 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.106 | 16.453 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.62B | 5,123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 6.73 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.34 | 76.09 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.05 | 28.18 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.60 | 98.16 | 97% |