Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LEGCX
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Columbia Cornerstone Growth C
Price$51.36
Change+$0.11 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.53B
GFAFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LEGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LEGCX (6.53B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. LEGCX (-0.77). LEGCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.45 vs. GFAFX (22.55).
| GFAFX | LEGCX | GFAFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.72 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.72 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | 3.050 | 301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.53B | 5,195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | -0.77 | -750% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.35 | 66.92 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 30.45 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | 77.41 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement