Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs KLCCX
GFAFX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.28
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
GFAFX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCCX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and KLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. KLCCX (1.29B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs KLCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs KLCCX (18 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. KLCCX (-25.85). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. KLCCX (-59.34).
| GFAFX | KLCCX | GFAFX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.96 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 16.952 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 1.29B | 26,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -25.85 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | -37.92 | -190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -59.34 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | -29.26 | -344% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement