Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs KLCAX
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$19.35
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and KLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCAX (1.29B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: GFAFX (0.29) vs KLCAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs KLCAX (18 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. KLCAX (-13.35). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. KLCAX (-42.79).
| GFAFX | KLCAX | GFAFX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.19 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.923 | 17.772 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.29B | 26,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -13.35 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.21 | -16.16 | -447% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -42.79 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.61 | 5.05 | 1,993% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement