Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs KLCAX
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$14.17
Change-$5.42 (-27.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and KLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KLCAX (1.12B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: GFAFX (0.22) vs KLCAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs KLCAX (18 years). KLCAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. KLCAX (-15.65). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. KLCAX (-59.86).
| GFAFX | KLCAX | GFAFX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.09 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.20 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | -1.597 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.12B | 30,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | -15.65 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | -28.65 | -156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | -59.86 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | -12.31 | -968% |