Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs KLCAX
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$14.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
GFAFX vs KLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCAX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and KLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KLCAX (1.17B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: GFAFX (0.28) vs KLCAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs KLCAX (18 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. KLCAX (-14.34). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. KLCAX (-57.57).
| GFAFX | KLCAX | GFAFX / KLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.09 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.178 | -11.321 | -81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.17B | 28,876% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | -14.34 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.35 | -21.33 | -306% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | -57.57 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | -21.79 | -443% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement