Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs JHBCX
GFAFX vs JHBCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs JHBCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$81.99
Change+$0.81 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$66.05
Change+$0.74 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.76B
GFAFX vs JHBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. JHBCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and JHBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. JHBCX (5.76B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: GFAFX (0.30) vs JHBCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than JHBCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs JHBCX (20 years). JHBCX (0.77) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: JHBCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. JHBCX (8.03). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.37 vs. JHBCX (32.84).
| GFAFX | JHBCX | GFAFX / JHBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.76 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.77 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.158 | 8.528 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 5.76B | 5,610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 8.03 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.64 | 75.66 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.37 | 32.84 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.25 | 86.81 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement