Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVNIX
GFACX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$40.13
Change-$5.63 (-12.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.82M
GFACX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and ZVNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ZVNIX (124M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVNIX (10 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than ZVNIX (1.16). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVNIX (15.24). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. ZVNIX (-0.67). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. ZVNIX (-16.34).
| GFACX | ZVNIX | GFACX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.00 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.16 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -5.108 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 124M | 270,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -0.67 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 82.41 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -16.34 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 396.04 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement