Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$38.95
Change-$5.53 (-12.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.82M
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ZVNBX (124M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. ZVNBX (-1.02). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. ZVNBX (-17.67).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.30 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.46 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -5.162 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 124M | 270,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -1.02 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 80.66 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -17.67 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 382.05 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement