Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$43.09
Change+$0.20 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.95M
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ZVNBX (136M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. GFACX (9.41). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. ZVNBX (13.99).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.30 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.52 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 13.904 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 136M | 247,059% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 23.68 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 124.90 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 13.99 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 341.95 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement