Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.24
Change+$0.42 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.53M
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ZVNBX (132M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX (5.00) and GFACX (4.93) have marching annual gain over last year. GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. ZVNBX (3.54).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.30 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.52 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.115 | 10.547 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 132M | 256,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 5.00 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.70 | 108.47 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.08 | 3.54 | 652% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.33 | 306.81 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement