Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.03
Change-$0.18 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.34M
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ZVNBX (132M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. GFACX (3.61). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. ZVNBX (-5.12).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.30 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.46 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.760 | 11.102 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 132M | 256,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | 6.32 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | 150.63 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | -5.12 | -250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | 310.05 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers