Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVGNX
GFACX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$51.31
Change-$10.83 (-17.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.13M
GFACX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and ZVGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ZVGNX (66.1M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVGNX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVGNX (11.55). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: GFACX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. ZVGNX (-1.50). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. ZVGNX (-16.32).
| GFACX | ZVGNX | GFACX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.30 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -9.824 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 66.1M | 508,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -1.50 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 88.29 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -16.32 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 562.92 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement