Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WPSZX
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.28M
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WPSZX (717M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSZX (0.15) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFACX (25 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. WPSZX (-6.52). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. WPSZX (17.57).
| GFACX | WPSZX | GFACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 6.938 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 717M | 47,001% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -6.52 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 33.25 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 17.57 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 100.84 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement