Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGCX
GFACX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$25.83
Change+$0.14 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.85B
GFACX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WLGCX (7.85B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: GFACX (25 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: GFACX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. WLGCX (5.30). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. WLGCX (13.44).
| GFACX | WLGCX | GFACX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.64 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.72 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 6.209 | 278% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.85B | 4,279% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 5.30 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 44.14 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 13.44 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 55.51 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers