Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs VRGWX
GFACX vs VRGWX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs VRGWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index I
Price$930.03
Change-$20.13 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.21B
GFACX vs VRGWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. VRGWX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and VRGWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. VRGWX (43.2B). VRGWX pays higher dividends than GFACX: VRGWX (0.45) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than VRGWX: GFACX (25 years) vs VRGWX (15 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VRGWX (0.06). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VRGWX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRGWX: GFACX (250) vs VRGWX (5000000). VRGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.58 vs. GFACX (6.76). VRGWX return over 5 years is better than : 112.42 vs. GFACX (30.74).
| GFACX | VRGWX | GFACX / VRGWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.06 | 2,267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.06 | 2,267% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.946 | 19.601 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 43.2B | 787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 20.58 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 110.74 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 112.42 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.09 | 391.57 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement