Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs USLCX
GFACX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$28.64
Change-$16.56 (-36.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
GFACX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. USLCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and USLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. USLCX (1.39B). GFACX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than USLCX: GFACX (25 years) vs USLCX (24 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. USLCX (29.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: GFACX (250) vs USLCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. USLCX (-36.96). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. USLCX (-42.32).
| GFACX | USLCX | GFACX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.89 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -5.416 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.39B | 24,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -36.96 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | -27.51 | -132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -42.32 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | -9.51 | -985% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement