Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs UGLSX
GFACX vs UGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs UGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6
Price$58.79
Change-$18.31 (-23.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
GFACX vs UGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. UGLSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and UGLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. UGLSX (1.35B). GFACX (0.00) and UGLSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than UGLSX: GFACX (25 years) vs UGLSX (14 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than UGLSX (0.78). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. UGLSX (29.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGLSX: GFACX (250) vs UGLSX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. UGLSX (-23.56). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. UGLSX (-17.96).
| GFACX | UGLSX | GFACX / UGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.77 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.78 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -5.330 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.35B | 24,834% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -23.56 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | -2.79 | -1,296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -17.96 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 54.02 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement