Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TRIRX
GFACX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TRIRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.43B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
Price$78.84
Change+$0.39 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.07B
GFACX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TRIRX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TRIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. TRIRX (18.1B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than GFACX: TRIRX (0.31) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: GFACX (25 years) vs TRIRX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.30). TRIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TRIRX (0) vs GFACX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.50 vs. GFACX (9.29). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 69.41 vs. GFACX (30.41).
| GFACX | TRIRX | GFACX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.30 | 453% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.30 | 453% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.033 | 16.050 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 18.1B | 1,867% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 19.50 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.04 | 93.21 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.41 | 69.41 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.42 | 270.88 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers