Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDZX
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Z
Price$22.73
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.47M
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDZX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. TBDZX (438M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDZX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDZX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBDZX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDZX (0.68). TBDZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). TBDZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TBDZX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.93 vs. TBDZX (4.10). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. TBDZX (17.79).
| GFACX | TBDZX | GFACX / TBDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.68 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.115 | 18.158 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 438M | 77,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 4.10 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.70 | 84.48 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.08 | 17.79 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers