Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDZX
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Z
Price$22.23
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets433.18M
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TBDZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. TBDZX (433M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDZX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDZX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBDZX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDZX (0.68). TBDZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). TBDZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TBDZX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. TBDZX (6.98). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. TBDZX (18.75).
| GFACX | TBDZX | GFACX / TBDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.68 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 16.327 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 433M | 77,829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 6.98 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 95.34 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 18.75 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement