Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.55
Change-$0.31 (-2.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets431.69M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. TBDCX (432M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. TBDCX (-4.17). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. TBDCX (-6.94).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.81 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.87 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.343 | 15.417 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 432M | 78,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | -4.17 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 68.53 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | -6.94 | -402% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.78 | 33.89 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement