Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$12.33
Change-$1.39 (-10.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets417.08M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TBDCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TBDCX (417M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). TBDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.58 vs. GFACX (0.14). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. TBDCX (-7.29).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.81 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.87 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -2.760 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 417M | 80,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 2.58 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 43.54 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -7.29 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 50.37 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers