Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.47M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. TBDCX (438M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. TBDCX (-3.76). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.23 vs. TBDCX (-9.26).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.81 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.87 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.322 | 17.632 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 438M | 77,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | -3.76 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.29 | 67.19 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.23 | -9.26 | -251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.11 | 32.53 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement