Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBRAX
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$20.94
Change-$0.31 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.97M
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBRAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SBRAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. SBRAX (87M). SBRAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBRAX (0.19) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: GFACX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. SBRAX (-11.28). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. SBRAX (4.67).
| GFACX | SBRAX | GFACX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.56 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.343 | 8.974 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 87M | 390,805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | -11.28 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 7.03 | 799% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | 4.67 | 597% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.78 | N/A | - |