Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBRAX
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$16.52
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.75M
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBRAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. SBRAX (78.7M). SBRAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBRAX (0.19) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SBRAX (27.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: GFACX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. SBRAX (-17.07). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. SBRAX (-20.06).
| GFACX | SBRAX | GFACX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.99 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.56 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.760 | -15.282 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 78.7M | 430,750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | -17.07 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | -8.50 | -673% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | -20.06 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement