Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBRAX
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$16.56
Change-$4.30 (-20.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.81M
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBRAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBRAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. SBRAX (65.8M). SBRAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBRAX (0.04) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SBRAX (27.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: GFACX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. SBRAX (-17.90). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. SBRAX (-23.35).
| GFACX | SBRAX | GFACX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.99 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.56 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | 1.346 | -81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 65.8M | 510,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -17.90 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | -13.33 | -272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -23.35 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement