Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.74M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. SBHAX (85.7M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. SBHAX (-11.51). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. SBHAX (5.24).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 5.940 | 291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 85.7M | 393,232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -11.51 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 9.75 | 664% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 5.24 | 585% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | 74.18 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement