Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$16.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.75M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. SBHAX (78.7M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SBHAX (27.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. SBHAX (-16.93). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. SBHAX (-19.79).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.84 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.93 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.760 | -15.105 | -45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 78.7M | 430,750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | -16.93 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | -8.17 | -701% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | -19.79 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | 44.00 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement