Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$16.60
Change-$4.31 (-20.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.81M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. SBHAX (65.8M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.05) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBHAX (13 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SBHAX (27.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. SBHAX (-17.81). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. SBHAX (-23.16).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.84 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.93 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | 1.405 | -77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 65.8M | 510,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -17.81 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | -13.15 | -275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -23.16 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 60.80 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement