Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.99
Change-$0.31 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.97M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SBHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. SBHAX (87M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. SBHAX (-12.65). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. SBHAX (3.34).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.343 | 7.476 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 87M | 390,805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | -12.65 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 6.81 | 825% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | 3.34 | 834% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.78 | 77.59 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement