Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBHAX
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$21.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.58M
GFACX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBHAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. SBHAX (84.6M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBHAX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SBHAX (0.93). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFACX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. SBHAX (-12.30). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.23 vs. SBHAX (2.44).
| GFACX | SBHAX | GFACX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.322 | 8.756 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 84.6M | 400,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | -12.30 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.29 | 4.10 | 1,372% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.23 | 2.44 | 954% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.11 | 75.32 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement