Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBJX
GFACX vs RMBJX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBJX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
GFACX vs RMBJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBJX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RMBJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RMBJX (115M). RMBJX pays higher dividends than GFACX: RMBJX (0.12) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBJX: GFACX (25 years) vs RMBJX (22 years). RMBJX (1.99) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RMBJX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBJX: GFACX (250) vs RMBJX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. RMBJX (-6.20). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.02 vs. RMBJX (-6.94).
| GFACX | RMBJX | GFACX / RMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.99 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.99 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -1.971 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 115M | 292,174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -6.20 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 6.79 | 533% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | -6.94 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | -13.75 | -681% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement