Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBHX
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RMBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RMBHX (116M). GFACX (0.00) and RMBHX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBHX: GFACX (25 years) vs RMBHX (51 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMBHX (1.24). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RMBHX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBHX: GFACX (250) vs RMBHX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. RMBHX (1.19). RMBHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.81 vs. GFACX (12.81).
| GFACX | RMBHX | GFACX / RMBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.24 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.24 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 51 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.760 | 3.556 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 116M | 292,241% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | 1.19 | 304% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | 30.21 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | 16.81 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | 2.55 | 2,837% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement