Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBHX
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RMBHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. RMBHX (115M). GFACX (0.00) and RMBHX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBHX: GFACX (25 years) vs RMBHX (50 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBHX (1.24). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBHX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBHX: GFACX (250) vs RMBHX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. RMBHX (-0.05). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. RMBHX (25.41).
| GFACX | RMBHX | GFACX / RMBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 50 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.268 | 6.447 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 115M | 293,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -0.05 | -17,331% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 25.38 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 25.41 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.65 | -6.64 | -1,214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers