Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBGX
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RMBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RMBGX (119M). RMBGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: RMBGX (0.09) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBGX: GFACX (25 years) vs RMBGX (9 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBGX (0.99). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBGX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBGX: GFACX (250) vs RMBGX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. RMBGX (1.69). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. RMBGX (24.80).
| GFACX | RMBGX | GFACX / RMBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.946 | 10.946 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 119M | 285,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 1.69 | 399% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 25.32 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 24.80 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers